Web Resources

"Matthew Johnson" wrote in
message
news:3D1235E6-7D21-6FE1-F2B0-7845DD4FD0A3@srcbs.org...
> In article
<92204EC1-76D2-EADE-75A8-6ADB19764611@srcbs.org>, Gary
says...
> >
> >Greetings Matthew:
> But this is where he oversimplifies. It is true that
GENERALLY, the ancient
> authors observe the rule of gender agreement here, but it
is not so compulsory
> as one might imagine.

Matthew, are you aware (or any other Greek expert here),
whether
there are ANY exceptions of gender match in the NT or the
LXX
like is asserted by Calvinists here in Eph?

Also, you said,
But please notice: though we agree on the end result, we
still disagree on the
method. For your Robertson quote is oversimplifying, and
despite his evident
expertise, he left himself too open to Kuyper's criticism.
My explanation does
not have this weakness.

But did I miss or overlook your "explanation?"


Thanks, Gary



((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

In article <082.36.22.05.804060000@srcbs.org>, basicallyblues says...
>
>
>
>>. Gen
>>5:24; Hebrews 11:5. Elijah went up to heaven, but was taken also, by
>>firey chariot. 2 Kings 2:11. Neither "ascended" which implies
>something
>>they did themselves. Thus, scripture remains intact and true.
>
>Nice try but you are wrong. Enoch "died" as Hebrews said.

No, it is you who are wrong. Hebrews does NOT say that Enoch died. On the
contrary: Hebrews even says that Enoch "did not taste death" (Heb 11:5). Recall
the verse:

By faith Enoch was taken up SO THAT HE SHOULD NOT SEE DEATH; and
he was not found, because God had taken him.
Now before he was taken he was attested as having
pleased God. (Heb 11:5 RSVA)

So no, Enoch never died.

[snip]


--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Gary McNees wrote:

> bimms@juno.com wrote:
>
> >
> > But a true Biblical understanding would notice two things:
> > 1. First, a non-regenerated person is free to do evil, and does so with
> > a vengeance, so much so that
> > the theoretical option of doing good never occurs and has never
> > occurred in the entire history of man.
>
> Why o why do people like so much to contradict Scripture?
>
> Matthew 7:11